Monthly Archives: January 2010

Uzbek photographer jailed for taking pics of unhappy children and wrinkly old people

I saw this on The Online Photographer today:

“The Plight of Umida Akhmedova”

Uzbek photographer Umida Akhmedova is facing either prison time or forced labor for a photo essay consisting of little more than pics of ordinary people.

Some of the pics can be accessed here.

The charges? “Defamation and insulting Uzbek traditions,” which seems especially ridiculous given that “Uzbek traditions” are the subject of the photos.

One can only speculate on the reason.  The photos include lots of pics of wrinkly-faced elderly people and at least one of unhappy looking children.  I suppose what it probably boils down to is that the pics were felt to be insufficiently flattering to the glory of the Uzbek homeland, or something like that.  Perhaps if Akhmedova had done a photo essay on posh gambling casinos, fancy resorts, and new infrastructure projects, she would have fared better with the authorities?  Who knows.

Whatever the motivation, it’s a cowardly and despicable action.

Is there anything that can be done?  It seems doubtful.  One commenter on TOP noted that the Uzbek regime has been known to machine-gun thousands of protesters, and has a secret police known for literally boiling people alive.  In light of that, I am guessing a few politely worded letters of concern would have little effect.  Attempts to shame foreign investors into pulling out also seem unlikely to succeed, considering that this incident is far less serious than others that have already happened, meaning if a particular company is still doing business in Uzbekistan, they are hardly going to care about one specific photographer getting stuck on a chain gang.

1 Comment

Filed under photography, politics

Rant of the Day

On my rounds of the interwebs this morning, I came across this excellent rant by Ken Rockwell:

Everything New Sucks

While there are some specific points that I don’t agree with, I think on the whole he is absolutely right. New stuff really does suck.

An example (not that a single example proves anything, but hey—this is a rant, not a proof): I bought my first CD player in 1987, and I used it for about twelve years, until I replaced it with my first DVD player. That DVD player started having tracking problems after about five years, meaning a replacement was needed. I felt cheated. What I didn’t realize at the time was that in the years since 1987, generally accepted standards of quality in electronic components had fallen substantially. In the mid 2000’s, a DVD player lasting five years was considered exceptional.

My second DVD player purchase was fairly painless, due to the low price (only about 15% of what I paid for the first one), but the fucking thing only lasted about a year before it started having the same problems as the first one, and then one day it just died completely. What’s more, based on reviews I read of that brand, a one year life span was actually better than average. Typical reviews went something like this: “Um yeah, mine lasted about a week past the 90 day warranty, but hey, it’s only a $50 player so it was no big deal. I went out and bought another one just like it.” Translation: He bought a cheap piece of crap DVD player which failed after three months, so he rewarded the company who perpetrated this travesty by going out and buying another one exactly like it. There were a lot of reviews like that. It was very disheartening.

Today, I am on my third DVD player, and, while it is lasting a much more respectable amount of time than that second one, it’s not as good as the first one was in its heyday. And the remote control sucks (more on that below).

Back to Rockwell: He also rants about cars, and I find I’m in complete agreement. I drive an older car, and to be perfectly honest, I would rather not replace it. I’m probably going to have to, though, because it’s so old now that keeping it running and operational is getting to be an issue. Important components are becoming difficult to find when the originals fail, and the rust on the body has gotten to the point where trying to abate it would be pointless. However, I’m not looking forward to replacing it with a newer car because, frankly, all the newer models suck by comparison. What’s more, this old, 1980’s model (which doesn’t even have fuel injection!) gets gas mileage comparable to a lot of modern day hybrids, meaning whatever I upgrade to, I’m also going to have to budget about a 50% increase in my gasoline costs. Ridiculous! What I’d really love is if I could just buy a car identical to the one I have, except brand spanking new. Anyone got a time machine I can borrow?

Rockwell also bitches about how cars and appliances don’t have enough knobs on them and how the few buttons they do have are grossly overused (a sentiment with which I completely agree), but then he raves about how his Apple remote control and iPod only have four or five buttons that do everything. Um, ok. :)

On the other hand, his comments about poorly designed TV remotes are right on the mark. The people who design these things seem to assume that I am actually going to be looking at them during operation, so they fill them up with exactly even rows and columns of exactly identical buttons. This is stupid. When I’m watching something on the TV, there are two facts which need to be considered: 1) I am not interested in taking my eyes away from the screen. 2) More importantly, even if I was, it’s usually too dark to read tiny little letters on the damn remote control anyway! Once past the initial learning curve, a properly designed remote operates entirely by feel. This means different buttons have to be different shapes and sizes. I’ve had remotes like this (on an old Toshiba VCR, for instance), and they were a joy to use.

The other critical feature of a good remote is not having to point it exactly at the sensor! A remote should work perfectly well even if you are pointing it as much as 45 degrees in the wrong direction. I’ve used remotes that were even better than that: They worked fine when pointed at the ceiling or exactly in the wrong direction (i.e. the infrared signal would bounce off the opposite wall or ceiling and still be strong enough to control the device). By contrast, my current DVD remote is one of the most finicky remotes I’ve ever used, requiring me to point it exactly at the front of the DVD player, with no obstructions whatsoever, and even then I often have to press a button twice to get it to work. What’s more, some of the most useful buttons on it are small, tactically identical rectangles, making it hard to operate by touch alone. (This remote, however, is one of only two flaws on an otherwise excellent player. It’s a Panasonic, in case you’re interested.) Why don’t I just buy a universal remote? Well, that’s a whole other subject. ;)

Rockwell’s essay also covers the loudness war, in which the audio quality of compact discs has deteriorated over the years. Rather than actually utilize some of the huge dynamic range possible on compact discs (which was a key selling point of the format back in the 1980’s), the dynamic range is compressed into a narrow band and amped up until the top of the waveform clips. This is so the recording sounds better when played on cheap-shit five dollar headphones, junky computer speakers, narrow bandwidth radio stations, and elevator P/A systems. For these limited purposes, the technique works fairly well. It’s a disaster, however, for getting an actual hi-fi experience out of the disc on even a mediocre quality full-fledged audio system.

So I don’t buy CDs anymore, unless I’m confident I’m getting a version that wasn’t mastered recently. I sold a bunch of discs back in 1993 because I needed some cash. Nowadays, I seriously regret doing that. Many of them, I assume, will have been remastered since I originally bought them, and it’s a safe bet that the newer version will be inferior to the old. What I need is a place to buy old, used compact discs. Or a time machine.

There’s more. Rockwell doesn’t like Snow Leopard, for instance, although his complaint about it only pertains to aesthetics. My own beef with Snow Leopard is that Apple decided to further obfuscate the definition of “gigabyte” by siding with hard drive manufacturers who, for years, have been defrauding the public with devices that don’t have as much capacity as advertised. They weasel out of committing actual, legal fraud with language in the fine print stating that, according to their definition, a gigabyte is one billion (1,000,000,000) bytes. This is a lie, and they only get away with it because there is no legal definition of “gigabyte.” In practice what it means is that you hook up your “one terabyte” hard drive to a Leopard or older system, and it shows that you only have 931 usable gigabytes. Windows users face a similar problem. Snow Leopard has “fixed” this by simply repeating the lie and reporting that the drive is a full terabyte. Meanwhile, RAM continues to be defined correctly, in powers of 2, like it always has, meaning an Apple system now has two different kinds of gigabytes: the kind on the hard drive, which is 1 billion bytes (or a terabyte being 1 trillion bytes), and the RAM kind, which is 1,073,741,824 bytes (that’s 2 to the 30th power). Furthermore, a gigabyte on an Apple Snow Leopard system will be different from a gigabyte on Windows, which should be fun for those of us who actually need to interact with the Windows world in a more-than-trivial way.

What annoys me more than anything about this problem, though, is that the average computer geek seems to believe Apple’s gigabyte trick is actually a good idea, because the “definition of giga is one billion, according to the SI standard.” This is the same type of pedantic, know-it-all mentality which came up with the “proof” that the 21st century started in the year 2001 because “the definition of a century is 100 years, and there was no year zero.” These people fail to understand that having two different, incompatible measuring systems is a much greater problem than having a few noobs complaining about their terabyte hard drives being smaller than expected, and a vastly greater problem than the utter triviality of the SI unit prefixes being used “incorrectly.”

The real solution would have been congressional regulation, that is, legally defining the different units as 1024 of the smaller unit, i.e. 1 terabyte = 1024 gigabytes, 1 gigabyte = 1024 megabytes, 1 megabyte = 1024 kilobytes, and 1 kilobyte = 1024 bytes. However, not only is that politically impossible in a nation where the main legislative body has stubbornly avoided their constitutional duty to “fix the standard of weights and measures” pertaining to computer systems, but it is already too late. For such regulation to have been truly effective, it would have needed to happen back in the 1980’s, or early 1990’s at the latest. Now that Apple has further muddied the waters, and geek-laden organizations like the IEC, IEEE and ISO have thrown their weight behind using two completely separate systems, meaningful regulations are never going to happen.

One thing that would really help would be if Microsoft would make the same change in their next version of Windows. That, at least, would solve the difficulty of using two different measuring systems depending on which OS platform you use, and it would keep the “kilo means 1000 not 1024” pedants happy. It would not resolve the inconsistency between hard drives and RAM, nor the fundamental inconvenience of having two very similar but not-quite-the-same systems in use simultaneously, but it would at least be an improvement over the current mess.

Anyway, this rant has been off the rails for some time now, so I’d better stop. :)

Leave a comment

Filed under annoyances, computers, links, politics

Blog Layout


I’ve been trying out different layouts for this blog over the past couple of days. I started with the one I use for my Four Things and a Lizard blog, and realized it looks gorgeous for that blog but won’t really work here. I previewed a bunch of others, even going so far as to install a couple of them. This one here is the only one which has really struck me as being “right” though.

It’s not perfect, of course. I don’t really like the little icons in the footer of each article. And when I completed and published my post from earlier today, I noticed there were links inserted at the bottom of it, to “possibly related” articles on other people’s blogs. I doubt I’m going to want that to stay there, assuming there’s an option to eliminate it somehow.

However, all things considered, it’s a very nice layout. It’s light enough on color elements that I can realistically use it for a blog that covers photography, but isn’t totally monochrome. It also features a customizable header, which I like. The one up there right now is a cropped section of this photo:

Broken Reeds

I may alternate it with other photos sometimes too.

Yes, I think this will work out pretty good! :)

Leave a comment

Filed under brainstorming, meta

Dry spell

Winter is now underway in earnest, and I’ve been in the midst of some photography blahs lately. The problem started when there wasn’t a single sunny day in the entire month of December, except for days when I was at work and couldn’t go outside. All others were cloudy, without exception. With sunrise being so late and sunset happening well before I get out of work, this was a pretty discouraging state of affairs. Even taking four days off around the Christmas holiday didn’t help—not one of them was sunny. Of course I took a stab at getting out with the camera anyway, on days when the roads weren’t clogged up with new snowfall, but I wasn’t exceptionally happy with the results.

Now that we are into January, the weather pattern has flipped and sunny days are much more common. As is typical, though, this means colder weather. Due to some car issues this year, I’m a little nervous about getting out into the middle of nowhere and leaving my car parked when it’s so cold out. A couple weeks ago it wouldn’t start due to an electrical problem. That issue has apparently been fixed now, but since then there have been some random instances of the blower shutting off briefly, or even refusing to start. Obviously I can drive the car without the blower, but it’s not pleasant when the heating system isn’t fully functional in the dead of winter. (And not being able to defog the windows in the morning is a real pain in the ass.)

I’m also getting discouraged about my new Flickr account. I had wanted to have all my old pics reposted over a month ago already, but I’m still dragging my feet. In fact, I haven’t made any progress in a while, except for deciding that there are definitely going to be some photos which will be skipped this time around. I’ve also realized it was a mistake to delete my old Flickr stream. Aside from casting off a lot of useless group subscriptions, I don’t think I’ve benefited from the switch in the least.

The final problem is more simple: I’m just not feeling all that inspired right now.

So for now, I’m amusing myself by trying different themes for this blog. I also want to take a look at the categories, because they seem like they could use some updating. There are also a bunch of draft posts that I should either finish or delete. Probably the tagging needs to be reviewed too. (Actually I hate tagging, but it is useful enough that I keep trying, as frustrating and imperfect as it is.) That’s also the main reason for this post—just to get myself doing something here, so I don’t let it slide completely, like I’ve pretty much done with my old Blogger blogs.

Speaking of which, I actually did take a quick look at my other blogs recently. Right now I have no ideas about what I would write on them, but there are at least two of them (out of four) which I would like to keep active. One is my SG-13 blog here on WordPress. I was reading some of my SG-13 posts last night and realized I’m very happy with a lot of what I did on that blog. I definitely want to get started on it again, if I can find the time.

Anyway. That is what has been up lately. :)

Oh—I believe Nikon is going to be coming out with a D90 replacement model sometime in the near future. I’d have to check but I think February was the time I heard mentioned. Sounds exciting! For a long time I considered the D90 to be the obvious choice for my next camera body. I even had the plan of purchasing one right around the time that the successor was announced, that way I’d get the D90 for a really reasonable price. Well, that time is now! And I am not ready to spend that kind of money just yet—I have credit card debt I’ve been dragging around since 1993 which is within two or three months of finally being paid off, so there is no way I’m spending $800 on a camera body until that is taken care of. However, this may not actually be a problem, since I have lately been thinking that the D90 successor might have some features that I could appreciate, in which case there is no rush. The other choice, of course, would be a D300s, and there is no rush on that either.

Leave a comment

Filed under brainstorming, doom and gloom, Flickr, meta, Nikon, photography